设为首页收藏本站新手激活药事管理抗菌药物药师培训举报中心药考软件
本站已运行

临药网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信扫一扫,快捷登录!

  • wx_jytEetEe3X4N大家说:祝贺临床药师网建网17周年
  • r1235201314rclinphar说:祝贺走过17个春秋,希望越办越好,一直陪伴我们。
  • hhw859大家说:这里真好,可以下载好多课件
  • hhw859大家说:大家好,工作顺利
  • wx_HQ_AwAoX大家说:一起加油!
  • wx_CfsfWCUwfUnd大家说:加油!!!
  • 568721zsl临床药师网说说:感谢分享知识
  • clinphar大家说:春节快乐,万事如意!
  • cwc平台说:发挥全国各临床药师的力量,众人是柴火焰高,一定会越办越好
  • 神女应无恙好的平台说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • wx_poNQQV902inq越办越好说:好的平台,希望吸引更多人才
  • 13885433081好的平台,希望越办越好说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • HF^O^平台说:希望临药网这个平台越办越好!
  • jingxuchen平台说:给我们基层工作的药师提供了帮助,关键时刻雪中送炭,敞开胸怀素材共享,万紫千红总是春,越来越兴旺!
  • lipinshang平台说:10多年的临药网忠实粉,在这里学到了很多,查找资料非常方便,愿平台越来越好。
  • sd13jyyyxklss平台说:好的平台,知识丰富,开阔眼界,望越办越好
  • liutangren平台说:风雨同舟相处十五年,越来越好。
  • 求知临床药师网说:生日快乐!从牙牙学语长成15岁“帅哥”
  • gary平台说:希望临床药师网越办越好,为广大临床药师提供更多的资源和交流
  • Alst210507平台说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • 15129825015临床药师网说:非常棒的平台,但愿越办越好。
  • 568721zsl临床药师网说说:药师学习平台,相信药师网越办越好
  • lzh0586临药网说:祝福网站越来越好,祝福同仁万事如意!
  • sunny-yaoshi临床药师网说:希望论坛越办越好,成为药学人员学习的首选网站!加油
  • 冬日暖阳~秀临药网说:此平台是药学人家园,常常来交流小憩,愿学科越来越好,愿药学人日子越来越好
  • 修行临床药师网说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • sln123临床药师网说:对我们工作非常有帮助
  • 一千小可爱临床药师网说:感谢这个平台,临床药师网yyds
  • 小分队临床药师网说:这个网站的内容对工作和学习的帮助太大了。内容质量好,权威性高
  • chuyinghong药师说:临床药师真正体现药师价值的机遇来了!
  • gyh660222感谢老师为交流平台做的贡献。说:对我们工作很有帮助
  • 郜琪臻太好了,终于又见面了说:越办越好
  • sunqi3541盛京医院说:希望能被基地录取
  • gary大家说:祝临床药师网越来越好
  • 柠檬梅子临床药师网的老师们说:谢谢临床药学网给我们基层药师提供学习平台,希望我们也能进专业平台学习
  • 我是庆宇平台说:恭喜恢复开放,这是我们临床药师的福音啊!
  • 祥籽clinphar说:我们支持~感谢临药网
  • Terry0915大家说:无意间点开网页 居然可以上了 还开心呀 希望网站越办越好
  • gfelwaiz临床药师网说:希望功能越来越完善
  • clinphar大家说:数据基本恢复完毕,大部分版块已经开放。
  • 海上升明月clinphar说:祝临床药师网越办越好 一直到永远
  • yyhh425666什么时候取消密码呢说:祝药师网越办越好
  • 鸢舞轩临床药学说:希望能在这里学到更多
  • clinphar大家说:数据恢复中,会逐步开放及取消密码。
  • 水月洞天自己说:做好自己就OK其余随缘
  • 梁药师201902227临床药师网说:好平台,提高自我的一个学习平台
  • Lion898大家说:共同成长!祝各位药师越来越学识渊博!
  • qazw310临床药学说:可找到组织了
  • clinphar大家说:贺临床药师网建站13周年!
  • tianshenglu临床药师网说:这真是个非常实用的论坛,希望越来越好
总共63695条微博

动态微博

查看: 4669|回复: 1

投稿有关信件的写法(英文)

[复制链接]

该用户从未签到

临床药师 发表于 2007-3-27 18:24:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
临床药师网(linyao.net)免责声明
禁止发布任何可能侵犯版权的内容,否则将承担由此产生的全部侵权后果;提倡文明上网,净化网络环境!抵制低俗不良违法有害信息。
一、投稿信
1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors,
It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?

五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.
3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.
10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.
11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.
13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.
15. The running title has been changed to “”.
16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.
17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.
18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).
19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.
20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.
21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:
22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.
23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.
24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.
25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.
临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007

该用户从未签到

jason_wwg 发表于 2011-7-27 12:00:55 | 显示全部楼层
非常实用
临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

1、禁止发布任何可能侵犯版权的内容,否则将承担由此产生的全部侵权后果。
2、请认真发帖,禁止回复纯表情,纯数字等无意义的内容!
3、提倡文明上网,净化网络环境!抵制低俗不良违法有害信息。

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表