设为首页收藏本站新手激活药事管理抗菌药物药师培训举报中心药考软件
本站已运行

临药网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信扫一扫,快捷登录!

  • wx_jytEetEe3X4N大家说:祝贺临床药师网建网17周年
  • r1235201314rclinphar说:祝贺走过17个春秋,希望越办越好,一直陪伴我们。
  • hhw859大家说:这里真好,可以下载好多课件
  • hhw859大家说:大家好,工作顺利
  • wx_HQ_AwAoX大家说:一起加油!
  • wx_CfsfWCUwfUnd大家说:加油!!!
  • 568721zsl临床药师网说说:感谢分享知识
  • clinphar大家说:春节快乐,万事如意!
  • cwc平台说:发挥全国各临床药师的力量,众人是柴火焰高,一定会越办越好
  • 神女应无恙好的平台说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • wx_poNQQV902inq越办越好说:好的平台,希望吸引更多人才
  • 13885433081好的平台,希望越办越好说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • HF^O^平台说:希望临药网这个平台越办越好!
  • jingxuchen平台说:给我们基层工作的药师提供了帮助,关键时刻雪中送炭,敞开胸怀素材共享,万紫千红总是春,越来越兴旺!
  • lipinshang平台说:10多年的临药网忠实粉,在这里学到了很多,查找资料非常方便,愿平台越来越好。
  • sd13jyyyxklss平台说:好的平台,知识丰富,开阔眼界,望越办越好
  • liutangren平台说:风雨同舟相处十五年,越来越好。
  • 求知临床药师网说:生日快乐!从牙牙学语长成15岁“帅哥”
  • gary平台说:希望临床药师网越办越好,为广大临床药师提供更多的资源和交流
  • Alst210507平台说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • 15129825015临床药师网说:非常棒的平台,但愿越办越好。
  • 568721zsl临床药师网说说:药师学习平台,相信药师网越办越好
  • lzh0586临药网说:祝福网站越来越好,祝福同仁万事如意!
  • sunny-yaoshi临床药师网说:希望论坛越办越好,成为药学人员学习的首选网站!加油
  • 冬日暖阳~秀临药网说:此平台是药学人家园,常常来交流小憩,愿学科越来越好,愿药学人日子越来越好
  • 修行临床药师网说:好的平台,希望越办越好
  • sln123临床药师网说:对我们工作非常有帮助
  • 一千小可爱临床药师网说:感谢这个平台,临床药师网yyds
  • 小分队临床药师网说:这个网站的内容对工作和学习的帮助太大了。内容质量好,权威性高
  • chuyinghong药师说:临床药师真正体现药师价值的机遇来了!
  • gyh660222感谢老师为交流平台做的贡献。说:对我们工作很有帮助
  • 郜琪臻太好了,终于又见面了说:越办越好
  • sunqi3541盛京医院说:希望能被基地录取
  • gary大家说:祝临床药师网越来越好
  • 柠檬梅子临床药师网的老师们说:谢谢临床药学网给我们基层药师提供学习平台,希望我们也能进专业平台学习
  • 我是庆宇平台说:恭喜恢复开放,这是我们临床药师的福音啊!
  • 祥籽clinphar说:我们支持~感谢临药网
  • Terry0915大家说:无意间点开网页 居然可以上了 还开心呀 希望网站越办越好
  • gfelwaiz临床药师网说:希望功能越来越完善
  • clinphar大家说:数据基本恢复完毕,大部分版块已经开放。
  • 海上升明月clinphar说:祝临床药师网越办越好 一直到永远
  • yyhh425666什么时候取消密码呢说:祝药师网越办越好
  • 鸢舞轩临床药学说:希望能在这里学到更多
  • clinphar大家说:数据恢复中,会逐步开放及取消密码。
  • 水月洞天自己说:做好自己就OK其余随缘
  • 梁药师201902227临床药师网说:好平台,提高自我的一个学习平台
  • Lion898大家说:共同成长!祝各位药师越来越学识渊博!
  • qazw310临床药学说:可找到组织了
  • clinphar大家说:贺临床药师网建站13周年!
  • tianshenglu临床药师网说:这真是个非常实用的论坛,希望越来越好
总共63693条微博

动态微博

    查看: 4737|回复: 4

    【英语学习】在青霉素过敏患者中 头孢类 碳氢霉烯类 和 单环类 的使用

      [复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情

    2020-7-30 14:47
  • stonejang 发表于 2009-5-13 10:06:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    临床药师网(linyao.net)免责声明
    禁止发布任何可能侵犯版权的内容,否则将承担由此产生的全部侵权后果;提倡文明上网,净化网络环境!抵制低俗不良违法有害信息。
    Use of cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams in penicillin allergic patients

    Author
    Roland Solensky, MD  Section Editor
    N Franklin Adkinson, Jr, MD  Deputy Editor
    Anna M Feldweg, MD  



    Last literature review version 17.1: January 2009 | This topic last updated: February 13, 2009 (More)


    INTRODUCTION —&#160enicillin allergy is reported by up to 10 percent of patients. A common clinical question is whether these individuals can safely receive structurally-related antibiotics, such as as cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams.

    This topic will discuss cross-reactivity between penicillins and structurally-related antibiotics in patients with type I, IgE-mediated allergy to penicillins. Penicillin allergy, skin testing, graded challenge (test dosing) and desensitization are reviewed separately. (See "Allergy to penicillins").

    Antigenic components of penicillins — In order to understand the possible cross reactivity among penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems and monobactams, it is helpful to review the potential allergens in penicillins. Patients with IgE-mediated allergy to penicillins may be reactive to the beta-lactam ring structure that is common to all penicillins, or to the R-group side chains that distinguish different penicillins from one another. In the United States, most penicillin allergic patients are sensitive to the beta-lactam core. In contrast, in southern Europe where amoxicillin constitutes 90 percent of antibiotic use in some countries, up to one third of patients are said to react to the R group side chain. (See "Allergy to penicillins"). A beta-lactam structure is also found in cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams (show figure 1). The aminopenicillins amoxicillin and ampicillin each have R-group side chains that are identical to the side chains of certain cephalosporins (show table 1).

    Multiple drug allergy syndrome — Multiple drug allergy syndrome is a term used to describe individuals who develop allergic reactions (either IgE- or non-IgE-mediated) to two or more non-crossreacting medications. It identifies a subset of individuals with an increased propensity for reacting to medications, for varied reasons that are only partly understood.

    In studies of patients with allergies to structurally related antibiotics, the concept of multiple drug allergy syndrome should be considered as a possible confounding factor [1] . This was illustrated in several large studies, which yielded unexpected results attributable to multiple drug allergy syndrome: In patients with a previous documented penicillin allergic-like event, the relative risk for an allergic-like event was higher not only for cephalosporins (10.1, confidence interval [CI] = 7.4 to 13.8), but also for the structurally distinct sulfonamides (7.2, CI = 3.8 to 13.5) [2] . Another study evaluated the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics in patients who had previously undergone penicillin skin testing [3] . Among these penicillin skin test-positive patients, allergic reactions during the first post-testing antibiotic treatment occurred more frequently with non-beta-lactam antibiotics (10.8 percent) than with cephalosporins (2.4 percent) [3] .

    Thus, multiple drug allergy may confound studies of potential cross-reactivity unless appropriate controls are included. Specifically, patients who are allergic to one drug and are challenged with a potentially related drug should also be challenged with an unrelated drug.

    CEPHALOSPORINS — There are two sources of structural similarity between the penicillins and the cephalosporins, as mentioned previously: the beta-lactam ring common to all penicillins and cephalosporins, and R group side chains that are shared by specific drugs (show figure 1). Based on limited data from Spain, the R group side chains are believed to be most important in predicting cross-reactivity between aminopenicillins and cephalosporins [4-6] .

    Amoxicillin and ampicillin each share R groups side chains with several cephalosporins (show table 1). As an example, amoxicillin and cefadroxil have identical side chains, and patients with IgE directed against the R-group would potentially react to these two drugs, but not to penicillin itself.

    In vitro and skin testing studies with penicillin and cephalosporins showed a high degree of immunologic cross-reactivity [7-11] , although this does not consistently translate into clinical cross-sensitivity, as described below.

    Limitations of clinical cross-reactivity studies — Most studies of clinical cross reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins have been limited by the following issues: Most cephalosporin challenges in the available studies were carried out in open fashion, rather than single- or double-blinded. All studies are lacking the control groups needed to identify patients with multiple drug allergy syndrome, such as penicillin skin test-positive patients challenged with a non-beta-lactam antibiotic, or patients allergic to a non-beta-lactam antibiotic challenged with cephalosporins [12,13] . (See "Multiple drug allergy syndrome" above).

    Risk of administration in patients with reported penicillin reactions — Among patients who report penicillin reactions (but do not undergo confirmatory testing), between 0.17 and 8.4 percent will react if given a cephalosporin. This estimate is based upon retrospective studies in which patients with a history of penicillin allergy were treated with cephalosporins WITHOUT preceding penicillin allergy testing (skin testing or in vitro testing) (show table 2) [14-18] .

    These studies have some additional limitations. Among the five leading reports, two were from the 1970s, and cephalosporins produced prior to 1980 are known to have been contaminated with trace amounts of penicillin [19] . In addition, these reports provided no information on the nature of the cephalosporin reactions. In the best-designed studies, there were two reactions to cephalosporins that were very questionable [16,17] . One of the reactions was worsening of eczema after several days of cephalosporin treatment and the other consisted of documentation in the anesthesia record of preoperative administration of hydrocortisone and diphenhydramine in a patient on chronic glucocorticoid treatment.

    In addition to the specific issues discussed above, there are some general design limitations: A significant subset of the patients in these studies were likely not allergic to penicillin at the time they were treated with cephalosporins, since large studies have shown that only about 10 to 15 percent of all patients who report a penicillin reaction in the past are found to have IgE-mediated penicillin allergy upon definitive evaluation [20-23] . This is reviewed elsewhere. (See "Allergy to penicillins", section on Introduction). There was presumably a selection bias in these real world studies in deciding which patients (ie, probably not the ones with recent or severe penicillin reaction histories) to treat with cephalosporins instead of non-beta-lactam antibiotics.

    For all of these reasons, these studies are not definitive regarding the frequency of reactions to cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic subjects.

    Risk of administration in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy —&#160enicillin-cephalosporin cross-reactivity studies that confirmed penicillin allergy by skin testing are superior in design compared to those that diagnosed penicillin allergy by history alone. Another group of studies evaluated patients with positive penicillin skin tests (to PPL, penicillin G and/or MDM) who were challenged with cephalosporins, and found an overall reaction rate of 3.4 percent (show table 3). If this analysis is limited to studies published after 1980 (when cephalosporins were no longer contaminated with penicillin), the reaction rate is reduced to 2 percent. Thus, approximately 2 percent of patients with skin-test proven sensitivity to penicillin can be expected to react to cephalosporins.

    Some investigators additionally performed cephalosporin skin testing (on penicillin test-positive patients) prior to cephalosporin administration, and administered cephalosporins only if those tests were negative (since ethical concerns prevented cephalosporin challenges in patients with positive cephalosporin skin tests) [4,24-26] . Because test-positive patients were not challenged with cephalosporins, the positive predictive value of cephalosporin skin testing could not be assessed, and its utility remains controversial.

    The approach outlined in this topic does not involve skin testing to cephalosporins. However, some experts do perform cephalosporin skin testing.

    Algorithm for management — The approach to administration of cephalosporins to patients with a history of penicillin allergy can be divided into scenarios when penicillin skin testing is or is not available (show algorithm 1). Penicillin skin testing reagents are not currently available commercially in the United States and many other parts of the world, although this is expected to change within the upcoming year. The protocol for penicillin skin testing is discussed elsewhere. (See "Allergy to penicillins", section on Penicillin skin testing).

    Skin testing is available — The results of penicillin skin testing can be used to guide management, as follows: If penicillin skin testing is performed and is negative, patients may safely receive cephalosporins (show algorithm 1) (show table 1). If penicillin skin testing is positive, then about 2 percent of these patients can be anticipated to react to cephalosporins. Without precautions, some of these reactions could be severe or life-threatening. Therefore, the options for management are:

          -  Administer an unrelated antibiotic (neither a penicillin nor a cephalosporin)


          - Administer a cephalosporin using a graded challenge. This is only necessary the first time a cephalosporin is given after testing and evaluation. (See "Graded challenge" above).

          - Administer a cephalosporin using a rapid desensitization procedure. This is the most conservative approach, and would be reserved for patients who were either at high risk for a recurrent reaction based on clinical characteristics, or who had comorbidities that would make them less likely to be able to withstand a recurrent reaction. Desensitization techniques are reviewed separately. (See "Allergy to penicillins", section on Desensitization).

    Skin testing is not available — If skin testing is not available, the clinician must estimate the chances of a serious IgE-mediated reaction to a cephalosporin based on the clinical history and time elapsed since the penicillin reaction. Based on large studies in which skin testing was performed, only 10 to 15 percent of patients reporting penicillin reactions will have positive penicillin skin tests. Of these, most (99 percent based upon the best-designed studies above [16,17] ) will tolerate a cephalosporin, especially one with a side chain group that is dissimilar to the culprit penicillin. Thus, we suggest the following approach: The patient is at lower risk for reacting to a cephalosporin if the reaction to penicillin occurred more than 10 years ago, and the symptoms involved were not suggestive of an IgE-mediated allergy. (See "Allergy to penicillins", section on Clinical manifestations and incidence).

    Such patients can simply be given the cephalosporin normally, provided the penicillin and cephalosporin in question do not share identical side chains. The patient is at greater risk for reacting to a cephalosporin if the reaction to penicillin occurred within the past 10 years, and/or if the symptoms involved were consistent with an IgE-mediated reaction. Such patients may be given a cephalosporin (with a dissimilar side chain) via graded challenge. (See "Graded challenge" below). Patients whose penicillin reactions were consistent with anaphylaxis are at highest risk and should be desensitized to the required cephalosporin.

    Graded challenge — The starting dose for a graded challenge is usually 1/100 or 1/10 of the full dose. Ten-fold increasing doses are administered every 30 to 60 minutes until the full therapeutic dose is reached. An example of a graded challenge to cefuroxime would be 2.5 mg, 25 mg, and 250 mg given at 60 minute intervals. The safe performance of graded challenges is reviewed in more detail elsewhere. (See "Allergy to penicillins" section on Graded challenge (test dosing)).

    Patients selectively allergic to amoxicillin or ampicillin —&#160atients confirmed to be selectively allergic to amoxicillin or ampicillin (ie, who tolerate penicillin) should avoid cephalosporins with identical R-group side chains (show table 1) or receive them via desensitization. They may receive cephalosporins with dissimilar side chains normally. Selective allergy to amoxicillin or ampicillin can only be determined with certainty with skin testing. (See "Allergy to penicillins", sections on Allergens and on Desensitization).

    This approach is based upon a small number of reports that evaluated patients proven to be selectively allergic to amoxicillin or ampicillin and tolerant to penicillin (via skin testing, in vitro testing, or oral challenge), with challenge to cefadroxil or cephalexin, respectively (show table 4). Overall, 11/45, or 24 percent reacted to a cephalosporin with identical R-group side chains [4-6] . Thus, based upon limited data from Spain, the rates of cross-sensitivity between agents with identical side chains appears to be significant among patients selectively allergic to aminopenicillins.

    The data regarding clinical cross-reactivity among drugs with similar (but not identical) side chains are even more sparse. Some investigators have proposed that patients who have reacted to a drug with a specific R group avoid all agents with similar R groups [27] , although there are no clinical data regarding cross-sensitivity upon which to base this recommendation.

    The management of patients who report a reaction to amoxicillin or ampicillin but have NOT been skin tested to determine if they are selectively allergic to the aminopenicillin is based upon clinical risk assessment, as follows: Only 10 to 15 percent of patients with a history of penicillin reactions are actually allergic to penicillin. Studies of penicillin-allergic patients in the United States and Europe have demonstrated geographical differences in the allergens to which patients become sensitized. These studies are reviewed elsewhere. (See "Allergy to penicillins", section on Allergens).

          – In the United States, less than 0.5 percent of penicillin-allergic patients are sensitized to R group side chains (ie, selectively allergic to aminopenicillins). Thus, these patients have a very small chance of reacting to cephalosporins based on side chain similarity. Therefore, they may be approached in identical fashion as described above for penicillin allergy. (See "Skin testing is not available" above).

          – In southern European populations, up to one-third of amoxicillin-allergic patients are sensitized to R group side chains. If a cephalosporin with an identical side chain is required, desensitization or cautious graded challenge is indicated. These patients may receive cephalosporins with dissimilar side chains according to the approach described above. (See "Skin testing is not available" above).

    CARBAPENEMS — Carbapenems share a common beta-lactam ring with penicillins and hence the potential for allergic cross-reactivity (show figure 1).

    Skin test cross-reactivity between these two groups of drugs was evaluated in one study, although patients were not subsequently challenged to confirm clinical reactivity, and skin testing to carbapenems has not been validated [28] . In this study, 40 patients with a history of penicillin allergy were skin tested to both penicillin and imipenem determinants [28] . Twenty were skin test-positive to penicillin, and 10 of these individuals also had positive skin tests to imipenem. In contrast, all 20 penicillin skin test-negative patients were also negative to testing with imipenem. This 50 percent skin test cross-reactivity is similar to that found with penicillins and cephalosporins [8,11] . Similar to the situation with cephalosporins, this does not appear to translate into clinical cross-reactivity.

    Clinical cross reactivity between penicillin and carbapenems has been studied with retrospective series of hospitalized patients with a history of penicillin allergy treated with imipenem or meropenem. These reports showed somewhat increased rates of reactions to carbapenems compared to patients without a history of penicillin allergy (show table 5). However, none of these patients underwent diagnostic testing for penicillin allergy to indicate they were allergic to penicillin at time of treatment with carbapenems.

    Three studies confirmed penicillin sensitization with skin testing, and then performed carbapenem challenges (show table 6) [29-31] . These studies demonstrated that 99 percent of patients with positive skin tests to penicillin will tolerate a carbapenem, essentially ruling out IgE-mediated allergic cross-reactivity between the drugs. Collectively, 320 penicillin skin test-positive patients underwent skin testing with imipenem or meropenem, were found to be negative, and then tolerated a graded challenge with the respective carbapenem [29-31] . Three additional penicillin skin test-positive patients (1 percent of the total group) had positive skin tests to carbapenem and so were not challenged with it [29-31] .

    Based on these data, clinical cross-reactivity between penicillins and carbapenems appears to be much lower than would be expected from skin test data. Hence the approach to patients with a history of penicillin allergy who require treatment with carbapenems is analogous to what was described above for cephalosporins: If penicillin skin testing is available and is negative, patients may safely receive carbapenems. If penicillin skin testing is positive, carbapenem may be administered via a 2 or 3 step graded challenge. If penicillin skin testing is unavailable, carbapenems may also be administered via graded challenge. This is based on the fact that only 10 to 15 percent of individuals with a history of penicillin allergy are actually allergic, and of those, over 99 percent are able to tolerate carbapenems.

    MONOBACTAMS — Aztreonam is the only clinically available monobactam and it has a monocyclic beta-lactam structure (show figure 1). In vitro studies and skin testing studies demonstrated no immunologic cross-reactivity between penicillin and aztreonam [32,33] . Likewise, aztreonam challenges of penicillin skin test-positive patients revealed no reactions [34-36] . As a result, patients with a history of penicillin allergy may safely receive aztreonam.

    INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — Educational materials on this topic are available for patients. (See "atient information: Allergy to penicillin and related antibiotics"). We encourage you to print or e-mail this topic review, or to refer patients to our public web site, www.uptodate.com/patients, which includes this and other topics.

    SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS —&#160enicillin-allergic patients can often be safely treated with other beta-lactam drugs. This requires an understanding of what is known from the literature about cross reactivity patterns among different beta-lactams, as well as the ability to assess an individual patient's risk. Among all patients reporting penicillin allergy, 85 to 90 percent will tolerate a penicillin, either because they were never allergic or because they had an earlier allergy that subsequently resolved. (See "Allergy to penicillins"). Past studies of cross-reactivity among beta-lactam antibiotics often overestimated the risk because immunologic evidence of cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies in skin tests and in vitro assays does not always translate into clinical cross-sensitivity with actual treatment. Patients with multiple drug allergy syndrome are another important source of confounding in cross-reactivity studies. (See "Introduction" above).

    Use of cephalosporins Among penicillin skin-test positive patients, approximately 2 percent will react to a cephalosporin. (See "Risk of administration in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy" above). The risk of a penicillin-allergic patient reacting to a cephalosporin may be assessed based upon the results of penicillin skin testing (if available), the clinical features of the penicillin reaction, and the time elapsed since the last reaction to penicillin (show algorithm 1). (See "Algorithm for management" above). Patients who reacted initially to amoxicillin or ampicillin should undergo the same risk assessment as penicillin-allergic patients. In addition, they should avoid cephalosporins with identical R-group side chains if they have positive skin tests to aminopenicillins, OR receive these cephalosporins via graded challenge or desensitization (show table 1). (See "atients selectively allergic to amoxicillin or ampicillin" above).

    Use of carbapenems Despite a significant rate of cross-reactivity between penicillins and carbapenems on skin testing, more than 99 percent of penicillin skin test-positive patients tolerate treatment with carbapenems. An individual patient's risk of reacting to a carbapenem may be assessed based upon the results of penicillin skin testing (if available), the clinical features of the penicillin reaction, and the time elapsed since the last reaction to penicillin. The approach is identical to that for cephalosporins. (See "Carbapenems" above).

    Use of aztreonam Aztreonam is the only monobactam currently available for clinical use. There is no evidence of immunologic cross reactivity between penicillins and monobactams, and penicillin-allergic patients may receive aztreonam normally. (See "Monobactams" above).


    Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement. REFERENCES
    临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007
  • TA的每日心情

    2021-5-23 22:32
  • fcbgyb 发表于 2009-5-13 11:23:30 | 显示全部楼层
    年初的时候我给学生找了下面这篇综述
    Cephalosporin use in treatment of patients with penicillin allergies
    Daryl D. DePestel, Michael S. Benninger, Larry Danziger, Kerry L. LaPlante,
    Chandler May, Allan Luskin, Michael Pichichero, and James A. Hadley

    继续学习
    临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007
  • TA的每日心情

    2020-7-30 14:47
  •  楼主| stonejang 发表于 2009-5-13 12:51:48 | 显示全部楼层
    看看有没有。。。找到。。。。下面是参考文献。。。。格式有点乱。。呵呵

    REFERENCES
    Asero, R. Detection of patients with multiple drug allergy syndrome by elective tolerance tests. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998; 80:185. Apter, AJ, Kinman, JL, Bilker, WB, et al. Is there cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins?. Am J Med 2006; 119:354. Macy, E, Burchette, R. Oral antibiotic adverse reactions after penicillin skin testing: multi-year follow-up. Allergy 2002; 57:1151. Audicana, M, Bernaola, G, Urrutia, I, et al. Allergic reactions to betalactams: studies in a group of patients allergic to penicillin and evaluation of cross-reactivity with cephalosporin. Allergy 1994; 49:108. Miranda, A, Blanca, M, Vega, JM, et al. Cross-reactivity between a penicillin and a cephalosporin with the same side chain. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98:671. Sastre, J, Quijano, LD, Novalbos, A, et al. Clinical cross-reactivity between amoxicillin and cephadroxil in patients allergic to amoxicillin and with good tolerance of penicillin. Allergy 1996; 51:383. Abraham, GN, Petz, LD, Fudenberg, HH. Immunohaematological cross-allergenicity between penicillin and cephalothin in humans. Clin Exp Immunol 1968; 3:343. Assem, ES, Vickers, MR. Tests for penicillin allergy in man. II. The immunological cross-reaction between penicillins and cephalosporins. Immunology 1974; 27:255. Batchelor, FR, Dewdney, JM, Weston, RD, Wheeler, AW. The immunogenicity of cephalosporin derivatives and their cross-reaction with penicillin. Immunology 1966; 10:21. Levine, BB. Antigenicity and cross-reactivity of penicillins and cephalosporins. J Infect Dis 1973; 128:Suppl:S364. Girard, JP. Common antigenic determinants of penicillin G, ampicillin and the cephalosporins demonstrated in men. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1968; 33:428. Moseley, EK, Sullivan, TJ. Allergic reactions to antimicrobial drugs in patients with a history of prior drug allergy (abstract). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991; 87:226. Smith, JW, Johnson, JE, Cliff, LE. Studies on the epidemiology of adverse drug reactions II. An evaluation of penicillin allergy. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:998. Petz, LD. Immunologic cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins: a review. J Infect Dis 1978; 137 Suppl:S74. Dash, CH. Penicillin allergy and the cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother 1975; 1:107. Daulat, S, Solensky, R, Earl, HS, et al. Safety of cephalosporin administration to patients with histories of penicillin allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:1220. Goodman, EJ, Morgan, MJ, Johnson, PA, et al. Cephalosporins can be given to penicillin-allergic patients who do not exhibit an anaphylactic response. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13:561. Fonacier, L, Hirschberg, R, Gerson, S. Adverse drug reactions to a cephalosporins in hospitalized patients with a history of penicillin allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc 2005; 26:135. Pederson-Bjergaard, J. Cephalothin in the treatment of penicillin sensitive patients. Acta Allergol 1967; 22:299. Park, M, Markus, P, Matesic, D, Li, JT. Safety and effectiveness of a preoperative allergy clinic in decreasing vancomycin use in patients with a history of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 97:681. Mendelson, LM, Ressler, C, Rosen, JP, Selcow, JE. Routine elective penicillin allergy skin testing in children and adolescents: study of sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984; 73:76. Sogn, DD, Evans, R, Shepherd, GM, et al. Results of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases collaborative clinical trial to test the predictive value of skin testing with major and minor penicillin derivatives in hospitalized adults. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:1025. Gadde, J, Spence, M, Wheeler, B, Adkinson, NF. Clinical experience with penicillin skin testing in a large inner-city STD Clinic. JAMA 1993; 270:2456. Romano, A, Gueant-Rodriguez, RM, Viola, M, et al. Cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:16. Novalbos, A, Sastre, J, Cuesta, J, et al. Lack of allergic cross-reactivity to cephalosporins among patients allergic to penicillins. Clin Exp Allergy 2001; 31:438. Warrington, RJ, Simons, FE, Ho, HW, Gorski, BA. Diagnosis of penicillin allergy by skin testing: the Manitoba experience. Can Med Assoc J 1978; 118:787. Pichichero, ME. A review of evidence supporting the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for prescribing cephalosporin antibiotics for penicillin-allergic patients. Pediatrics 2005; 115:1048. Saxon, A, Adelman, DC, Patel, A, et al. Imipenem cross-reactivity with penicillin in humans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 82:213. Atanaskovic-Markovic, M, Gaeta, F, Medjo, B, et al. Tolerability of meropenem in children with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. Allergy 2008; 63:237. Romano, A, Viola, M, Gueant-Rodriguez, RM, et al. Tolerability of meropenem in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:266. Romano, A, Viola, M, Gueant-Rodriquez, RA, et al. Imipenem in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2835. Saxon, A, Swabb, EA, Adkinson, NF Jr. Investigation into the immunologic cross-reactivity of aztreonam with other beta-lactam antibiotics. Am J Med 1985; 78:19. Adkinson, NF Jr, Saxon, A, Spence, MR, Swabb, EA. Cross-allergenicity and immunogenicity of aztreonam. Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7 Suppl 4:S613. Adkinson, NF Jr. Immunogenicity and cross-allergenicity of aztreonam. Am J Med 1990; 88:12S. Vega, JM, Blanca, M, Garcia, JJ, et al. Tolerance to aztreonam in patients allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics. Allergy 1991; 46:196. Patriarca, G, Schiavino, D, Lombardo, C, et al. Tolerability of aztreonam in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to beta-lactams. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2008; 21:375.
    临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007

    该用户从未签到

    jason_wwg 发表于 2011-7-27 10:13:57 | 显示全部楼层
    辛苦了,谢谢
    临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007
  • TA的每日心情

    2024-8-15 10:16
  • ray5525 发表于 2019-4-19 14:31:15 | 显示全部楼层
    学习了  
    临床药师网,伴你一起成长!微信公众号:clinphar2007
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    本版积分规则

    1、禁止发布任何可能侵犯版权的内容,否则将承担由此产生的全部侵权后果。
    2、请认真发帖,禁止回复纯表情,纯数字等无意义的内容!
    3、提倡文明上网,净化网络环境!抵制低俗不良违法有害信息。

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表